Ok, so i may touch on subjects i previously covered (even i don't remember all i
write)... Now, i'll go into somewhat conservative mode (actually a little
harder line than most conservatives). i was watching a thoroughly mediocre
move, Switch, recently which got me thinking about some of
these issues again.
No, the government should not be in your bedroom.
You should be able to do what you want (within legal constraints in the comfort
of your home). In the past government has stepped in to define things like
marriage from a reproductive standpoint. i consider some of tenets of
"reproductive rights" to be a form of equine fertilizer. Different cultures
have different practices, which should be respected as viable options in those
territories (regardless of the "western" filtered view of what is acceptable).
It is not the wealthier countries place to impose standards on other
countries/cultures.
Like everything else in life (and i'm reticent to
call everything a "right" as it is probably one of the most overused/misused
terms, at least recently), there are practical limits. A good or service should
never be considered a right. The state can define certain things relating to
the human reproductive condition. For example a country with a high
population (like China) has the right to impose limits on births. In certain
ways, that may be forcing some semblance of responsibility on an out of control
population. A country cannot support a growing population forever with limited
resources.
No, i am not a fan of abortion - once you get on the train
you should stay on until it comes to your stop. Pregnancy is a natural
consequence of the reproductive act (or at least there is always a chance - the
chance can be lessened though). In other words, i find abortions to be a
fundamental dereliction of duty and a profound lack of ethics.
This
is playing up the theory that man is above nature. i disagree.
The topic of the movie Switch was artificial
insemination (surprise, i'm not a fan). Basically infertility is sort of a weak
built in population control - i am not a fan of humanity trying to circumvent
biology through the use of technology. Artificial insemination must have been
one of the keystones of feminism - being so empowered that a woman could have a
child without a man (but still needing male genetic material). This is really
messed up thinking. Basically if a woman wants to get pregnant, the only option
should be the natural one, the time tested method. Although i don't necessarily
like the concept of single mothers, sometimes that will be the way it has to
be. i don't like the human over nature message that things like artificial
insemination entail.
No comments:
Post a Comment