Thursday, January 17, 2013

My Conservative Manifesto (MCM): Part 11: Foreign Policy

Foreign Policy:

Introduction:
So, what should the focus and purpose of US foreign policy be?  That is today's question.  Foreign policy is a tricky issue that involves both military and economic interests.  There are numerous real world subtleties that i will mostly ignore here.

Responsibilities of a "World Power":
What responsibilities do the so called world powers (you could use G8 or other categorizations) have to the rest of the world?

My answer is that world powers have no stated or unstated duty to intervene in the affairs of other nations.  A country has a responsibility to its citizens (and that is all).  If citizens, private enterprise, etc feel the urge to donate to things like the semi-recent "disaster" in Japan, that is one thing.  However it is a completely different animal using taxpayer funds for non-domestic purposes.

For the record, i do not believe federal funds should be used for international issues.  It is not responsible, especially for a debt loaded country like the US, to spend taxpayer money on foreign concerns.

Military Role on the Global Scale:   
So what should the global role of a country's military be?

For me that is a straight-forward answer, but an answer that many will not like - nothing.  Yes, i am a fan of military isolationism.  The only military justification i see is a creditable, well-defined, and eminent threat to locations on US soil.  The "war on terror" is not winnable and does not qualify.

i view the US military operations in the world as an archaic relic from the post World War II and Cold War era.  This seems to be more about stopping the spread of Communism.  It is not the duty of the US to foster democracies through military force.  i would prefer most, if not all, of the US military bases around the world be closed.  The US can no longer afford to keep them in operation - and ego is not a valid reason.  

The US military should not be the world's peacekeepers.  Let countries handle there own issues.  If some genocide happens, that is too bad.  Military use should never be a "moral" issue.  Let the United Nations (the questionable organization that they are) handle these problems.

i view the military as something that is necessary for a country.  However, as it is basically an non-productive use of resources, it should be limited in scope and size.  i will admit that some good things came as the result of military spending (the Internet for one).

However, if a war situation happens... i wouldn't discount the use of any method (even if that method is generally considered immoral or evil).  If a country needs to torture prisoners of war, assassinate a foreign leader it is at war with or kill civilians, i wouldn't take that off the table.  In the worst case scenario, i see nothing wrong with actually using your nuclear arsenal.

World Trade:
It is far better to be an economic power than a military super power.

Really, it shouldn't be the interactions between countries, but the economic interactions between parties (like corporations), etc that makes up world trade.  Unfortunately, it may be necessary for the federal government to sign large scale treaties and trade agreements.  To me, it is the economic success and opportunities that define success for a country.

Trade partners are a good thing to have, but it kind of crosses the line when a trade partner gets involved in a military conflict.  i guess, you could say that it was ok (barely) if such actions provide a greater benefit to the people/companies of a country than the cost of the action.  Israel is probably the trickiest example for the US.

That being said... countries should strive to minimize interference with market forces.  Protectionist tactics like tariffs and even subsidies are largely counterproductive (and might result in the same thing from the other side).  i acknowledge that sometimes it will be necessary for a country's people to assert its rights via the government.  It may also be the only way to help open up markets in certain circumstances.

Simply Summing it Up:
Free trade is good, war is bad. Let other countries deal with their own problems

Original Post Date: 03/31/11

No comments:

Post a Comment