Political mid-term campaigns are (hopefully) winding down. So, in a few weeks i
won't have to be bombarded by campaigns (especially) Democratic where the
candidate is touting some counter-productive ideal that is disastrous in the
real world (the rising tide of liberal fascism). Should a democrat add make the
republican candidate look better?
The democrats always use stuff like
social security as a canard. Candidate x wants to cut social security. That
would be a plus for me. You are talking about a pyramid scheme (like most
pensions) that is more dependent on a rising population (a bad thing) than any
kind of tangible investment scheme. People tend to overstate the returns
(conveniently overlooking the penalty for employment the employer is hit with).
There is 13% of potential earnings the worker will never see. Social security
is a tax, plain and simple, and not a promise. People in my generation would be
better served just taking the money they would have spent on social security and
buying lottery tickets with the money.
Another lie is the "middle class"
tax. The middle class is actually one of the most under-taxed groups there is.
The amount they get off for mortgages and children is insanely high). For some
people they are complaining about a 4-5% real tax rate. Of course, the
"progressive" tax scheme is off base anyway. Nobody should get a free tax ride
(or benefit from taxes like many people currently do). It is basically like
Robin Brain: steal from the rich and give to themselves. The tax burden is put
squarely on the shoulders of the successful. What kind of message does that
send: make more money so the government can take it and spend it on useless
programs that foster dependence on the government? Do the congress people
really have your interests in mind when they have a pension plan (should be
eliminated) and constantly vote themselves raises. There is a major conflict of
interest going on.
i hate it when a candidate brags about pork they
brought home. Pork project don't help anyone, but they hurt everyone. There is
no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody has to pay for it. That is just the
unconscionable wasting of tax payer resources. Government: they money you spend
is not yours. It is a betrayal of the country to spend it how the government
has.
If you haven't figured it out by now, i am a fiscal
conservative. i think the views on fiscal responsibility of the two parties can
be generalized as such...
* Liberals: raise taxes on the people who won't
vote for you anyway (soak the rich) and use the funds to try and buy votes. You
can't cut spending, you have to raise taxes to balance the budget (though they
don't have an incentive to do so, especially those who want the government to
flame out in a barrage of bad debt and inflation). If the budget is ever
actually balanced - it is a fluke.
* Conservatives: cut spending (now if
they would actually do it. i know it is easier done than said). The current
revenue base is sufficient (it is), but spending is out of control. Much of
what the federal government does is overreaching and counterproductive
(especially from a financial view).
Original Post Date: who knows, blogger post date 10/23/10
No comments:
Post a Comment